Skip to content

Filter out working groups by default#2295

Closed
martinbonnin wants to merge 1 commit intosourcefrom
filter-out-working-group
Closed

Filter out working groups by default#2295
martinbonnin wants to merge 1 commit intosourcefrom
filter-out-working-group

Conversation

@martinbonnin
Copy link
Contributor

@martinbonnin martinbonnin commented Jan 9, 2026 •
edited
Loading

See #2288 (comment)

I'm currently unable to run the website locally because of:

$ pnpm dev

> @0.0.0 dev /Users/martinbonnin/git/graphql.github.io
> next

  ▲ Next.js 14.2.35
  - Local:        http://localhost:3000

 ✓ Starting...
 ⚠ Invalid next.config.js options detected:
 ⚠     Unrecognized key(s) in object: 'typedRoutes'
 ⚠ See more info here: https://nextjs.org/docs/messages/invalid-next-config
   automatically enabled Fast Refresh for 2 custom loaders
 ✓ Ready in 1549ms
(node:27673) Warning: `--localstorage-file` was provided without a valid path
(Use `node --trace-warnings ...` to show where the warning was created)
 ○ Compiling / ...
 ⨯ ./src/pages/index.mdx
TypeError: localStorage.getItem is not a function
 ⨯ ./src/pages/index.mdx
TypeError: localStorage.getItem is not a function
   automatically enabled Fast Refresh for 2 custom loaders
 ⨯ ./src/pages/index.mdx
TypeError: localStorage.getItem is not a function
 ⨯ Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/Users/martinbonnin/git/graphql.github.io/.next/fallback-build-manifest.json'
    at readFileSync (node:fs:435:20)

Not really sure what's going on, take this with a grain of salt.

Edit: Welp, that didn't seem to work in the preview either 😞

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 9, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Review Updated (UTC)
graphql-github-io Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jan 9, 2026 5:08pm

@martinbonnin martinbonnin marked this pull request as draft January 9, 2026 17:12
@Urigo
Copy link
Contributor

Urigo commented Jan 11, 2026

why?

@martinbonnin
Copy link
Contributor Author

martinbonnin commented Jan 11, 2026

See #2288 (comment), for core community, the working groups are useful but for the public at large it's a bit overwhelmning IMO.

One could argue this could drive more people to the working groups. My logaf is quite low and my TS skills lacking, feel free to close this PR.

@Urigo
Copy link
Contributor

Urigo commented Jan 11, 2026

I guess it makes sense
on the other hand, maybe it means we just need more meetups to balance :)

@martinbonnin
Copy link
Contributor Author

martinbonnin commented Jan 11, 2026

We definitely need more meetups :)

@benjie
Copy link
Member

benjie commented Feb 5, 2026

Recommend closing in favour of #2328

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@martinbonnin @Urigo @benjie